|
| E-Update |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GREETINGS!
Thank you for subscribing to
E-Update, the complimentary monthly electronic
estate planning bulletin from the Trusts and Estates
Practice Group of Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton,
P.C.
Our estate planning attorneys provide sound estate and business succession plans utilizing:
On December 23, 2008, President
Bush signed into law the "Worker, Retiree, and
Employer Recovery Act of 2008", (the "Act"), which
includes a waiver of minimum required distributions
("MRDs") in 2009. Important items to note follow.
For more information regarding this topic, please
e-mail your requests to
Salvatore J.
LaMendola, or call Sal at (248) 457-
7204.
Once touted as a less expensive
alternative to the family limited partnership (FLP) or
family limited liability company (FLLC), the restricted
management account (RMA) is now dead. An RMA is
an investment account established (under a written
agreement) with a bank or brokerage firm. Generally,
under the terms of the agreement, the investor agrees
to relinquish control of assets to an investment
manager for a term of years. During the term of the
agreement, the investor cannot make withdrawals
from the account, and transfers of the account are
limited to family members.
The "non-tax" reason given for establishing such accounts was the improvement of the accounts' long- term investment performance. The fixed term of the RMA encouraged the investment manager to focus on long-term performance. In addition, the long-term relationship often resulted in lower management fees. Of course, the added benefit (to the investor) was the hoped-for valuation discounts for lack of control and marketability - without the expense of creating an FLP or FLLC. Unfortunately, in Rev. Rul. 2008-35, 2008-29 (July 21, 2008), the IRS ruled that no marketability discount was appropriate for a depositor's gift of an interest in an RMA in which assets were under the management of a bank (and its investment advisors) and as to which the depositor could not remove the bank for at least five years and could only transfer the interest to close family members.
For more information regarding this topic, please
e-mail your requests to
Julius H.
Giarmarco, or call Julius at (248) 457-
7200.
Effective August 17, 2006, Internal
Revenue Code Section 6039I requires the
policyholder of an "employer-owned life insurance
contract" as defined in IRC Section 101(j) issued after
August 17, 2006, to file a return providing certain
information. Previously, the Internal Revenue Service
issued proposed and temporary regulations with
respect to this reporting requirement. On November
5, 2008, the Internal Revenue Service issued final
regulations under IRC Section 6039I.
The final regulations did not provide any substantive changes to the prior regulations. Policyholders of "employer-owned life insurance contracts" are still required to file IRS Form 8925 beginning with its 2007 income tax year. IRS Form 8925, "Report of Employer- Owned Life Insurance Contracts," is required to be attached to the policyholder's income tax return by the due date of the return. That Form is required to be filed for any tax year ending after November 13, 2007. Finally, IRC Section 6039I also requires that each policyholder (or employer) keep such records as may be necessary for purposes of determining whether the requirements of that section and IRC Section 101(j) are met. Interestingly, none of the regulations that have been issued to date by the IRS address this record retention requirement. At the current time, it appears that the IRS does not have any current plans to issue guidance regarding such record requirements.
For more information regarding this topic, please
e-mail your requests to
Thomas P.
Cavanaugh, or call Tom at (248) 457-
7218.
On January 16, 2008, the U.S.
Supreme Court rendered its unanimous decision in
Knight v. CIR, holding that investment advisory
fees
incurred by trusts and estates are subject to the 2%
floor on miscellaneous itemized deductions under
IRC § 67(e). Thus, trustee fees and executor
commissions (which are fully deductible) must
be "unbundled" from investment advisory fees (which
are subject to the 2% floor). Prior to the Knight
decision, it was common for fiduciaries to bundle
these services as part of one integrated fee or
commission.
On December 11, 2008, the IRS issued Notice 2008- 16 which announced that trustees and executors do not have to unbundle the investment portion of their fiduciary fees until 2009. Thus, for 2008 and prior tax returns, trustee fees and executor commissions are fully deductible under IRC § 67(e). The Notice was necessary because regulations under § 1.67-4 will not be issued in time for fiduciaries to prepare their 2008 tax returns. When the Regs are issued, we will report them to you in a future E-Update.
For more information regarding this topic, please
e-mail your requests to
Julius H.
Giarmarco, or call Julius at (248) 457-
7200.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||