GMH Logo
E-Update )
Editor: Salvatore J. LaMendola, Esq. February 2011
In This Issue:
  • IMPACT OF NEW TAX LAW ON RETIREMENT PLAN PLANNING
  • PRESIDENT OBAMA'S 2012 BUDGET PROPOSAL WOULD DECREASE THE ESTATE AND GIFT TAX EXEMPTIONS
  • 2011 OPENS WITH AN INHERITED IRA WIN IN ARIZONA
  • ESTATE PLANNING FOR NON-TAXABLE ESTATES
  • March 2011 AFRs

  • GREETINGS!

    Thank you for subscribing to E-Update, the complimentary monthly electronic estate planning bulletin from the Trusts and Estates Practice Group of Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C.


    Our estate planning attorneys provide sound estate and business succession plans utilizing:
    • Revocable Living Trusts
    • Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts
    • Qualified Personal Residence Trusts
    • Grantor Retained Annuity Trusts
    • Sales to Grantor Trusts
    • Business Succession Plans
    • Split-Dollar Plans (Private and Employer)
    • Generation-Skipping Transfers
    • Charitable Trusts
    • Buy-Sell Agreements
    • Specialized Trusts for Retirement Benefits
    • Asset Protection Trusts
    For a referral to one of our attorneys, please call Julius Giarmarco, Esq. at (248) 457-7200.


    IMPACT OF NEW TAX LAW ON RETIREMENT PLAN PLANNING

    How does the new tax law affect those who own significant retirement plans? Clearly, one of the most important changes is the introduction of "portability", which is why it is ranked first in our top ten list below.

    1. Because of "portability" of the federal estate tax exemption, most married couples can now name each other as the sole beneficiary of their retirement plans, unless other factors such as protection from predators on the elderly, state estate taxes, protection from creditors, or remarriage are of concern.

    2. The larger federal estate tax exemption creates a great opportunity to build up and transfer estate and income tax-free wealth via Roth IRAs.

    3. Naming trusts for grandchildren as beneficiaries of retirement plans for "super stretch-outs" is more easily done because of the higher federal GST exemption (not portable).

    4. The larger federal gift tax exemption (also portable) makes easier large "upstream gifts" to parents and grandparents to cover the cost of their own Roth IRA conversions.

    5. Similarly, the larger federal gift tax exemption makes easier large "downstream" gifts to children to pay the cost of their Roth IRA conversions.

    6. The extended relatively low income tax rates make Roth IRA contributions (whether directly or "backdoor") continue to look good.

    7. For the same reason, those converting to Roth IRAs in 2010 will now more likely want to let the default "two year spread" apply (2010 conversions only).

    8. Again for the same reason, those who did not convert to a Roth IRA in 2010 may want to reconsider, especially if future income tax rates are expected to be higher.

    9. Qualified charitable distributions (2011 only) can be used to "hit three birds with one stone": (1) to fulfill charitable intent (including making good on charitable pledges), (2) to satisfy a 2011 RMD obligation, and (3) to improve the basis ratio for a later Roth IRA conversion.

    10. The reduction of the employee share of Social Security (FICA) from 6.2% to 4.2% (2011 only) will free up as much as $2,136 ($106,800 x 2%) which can be used to increase contributions to 401(k)s or other retirement plans.

    For more information regarding this topic, please e-mail your requests to Salvatore J. LaMendola, or call Sal at (248) 457-7204.

    THIS ARTICLE MAY NOT BE USED FOR PENALTY PROTECTION.

    PRESIDENT OBAMA'S 2012 BUDGET PROPOSAL WOULD DECREASE THE ESTATE AND GIFT TAX EXEMPTIONS

    On February 14, 2010, President Obama introduced his 2012 fiscal budget proposal. When Congress takes up the President's budget, most of the discussion will be on income taxes and expenditures for national security and safety-net programs (such as Social Security and Medicare).

    However, the President's proposal includes the following provisions that would affect wealthier taxpayers:

    • An increased top rate on ordinary income from 35% to 39.6%; and on dividends and long term capital gains from 15% to 20%.

    • A limit on the value of itemized deductions for wealthier taxpayers, which faces opposition from charities and the housing industry.

    • A crack-down on short term GRATs.

    • A return on the estate tax to its 2009 state in 2013, which includes a $3.5 million estate tax exemption, a $1 million gift and GST tax exemption, and a 45% top rate.

    However, the President's proposal does not eliminate the portability clause for married couples.

    For more information regarding this topic, please e-mail your requests to Julius Giarmarco, or call Julius at (248) 457-7200.

    THIS ARTICLE MAY NOT BE USED FOR PENALTY PROTECTION.

    2011 OPENS WITH AN INHERITED IRA WIN IN ARIZONA

    In In re Thiem, 2011 Bankr. LEXIS 376, the Arizona Bankruptcy Court decided that, in Arizona, inherited IRAs are protected under both the federal opt-out state exemption for retirement plans and the state exemption for retirement plans. (An "opt-out" state is a state that has "opted-out" of the federal bankruptcy exemptions, requiring its citizens to use only the state-provided exemptions in bankruptcy. The State of Michigan is not an "opt-out" state.) Our updated summary chart can be found here: Inherited IRAs In the Courts.

    It should be noted that in using the chart, it is the beneficiary's state that is relevant, not the plan owner's. For example, an Arizona 401(k) plan participant whose children live in Florida, Texas and Illinois should not rest easy with this Arizona decision. The favorable outcome in her home state will be of no use to her non-resident children when at her death they rollover her plan into inherited IRAs of their own. Rather, she should be concerned by the fact that all of her children live in "Loss" states. The same would be true of a Michigan plan owner whose children live in "Loss" or "Win**" states, or in states not on the chart for lack of case law, such as Michigan.

    For more information regarding this topic, please e-mail your requests to Salvatore J. LaMendola, or call Sal at (248) 457-7204.

    THIS ARTICLE MAY NOT BE USED FOR PENALTY PROTECTION.

    ESTATE PLANNING FOR NON-TAXABLE ESTATES

    Whether the estate tax exemption remains at $5 million or is reduced to $3.5 million in 2013 (as President Obama is requesting in his fiscal 2012 budget), less than 2% of Americans have taxable estates. Even so, for those clients, estate planning is still very important.

    Everyone should have a revocable living trust to avoid the costs, delays and publicity associated with probate - not only upon death, but also in the event of incapacity. Probate is a lawsuit that you file against yourself and then lose. Besides avoiding probate, living trusts assure grantors that what they have, goes to whom they want, when they want, and how they want. For example, a living trust can provide for a surviving spouse's health, maintenance and support, while at the same time preventing the surviving spouse from intentionally (or unintentionally) disinheriting the grantor's children. A living trust can also protect the grantor's heirs from their inability, their disability, their creditors and predators (including ex-spouses). This is accomplished by leaving the assets in trust for the benefit of the heirs (until they reach certain ages) under the management of a qualified trustee. To add flexibility, the trust agreement can provide the beneficiaries with a limited power of appointment so that the beneficiary can determine who receives the property upon his/her death (either outright or in trust) prior to the complete termination of his/her trust.

    In addition, everyone needs a general power of attorney for financial matters and a health care power of attorney. The former document complements the living trust in helping to avoid a conservatorship or guardianship if the grantor becomes incapacitated. The health care power of attorney allows the patient advocate to carry out how the patient wants to spend his/her last days.

    Finally, a will is needed to name guardians for minor children, to name a personal representative of the estate, and to "pour over" into the testator's living trust any assets that the testator failed to transfer to his/her living trust during lifetime. But assets that are transferred to a living trust at the testator's death will have to be probated. That is why funding living trusts is an important part of the planning process. Moreover, to assure that both income and estate taxes are minimized, careful consideration must also be given in deciding what assets to put in each spouse's living trust, as well as selecting the proper beneficiary for retirement plans.

    For more information regarding this topic, please e-mail your requests to Julius Giarmarco, or call Julius at (248) 457-7200.

    THIS ARTICLE MAY NOT BE USED FOR PENALTY PROTECTION.

    March 2011 AFRs



    Compounding Period
    AnnualSemiannualQuarterlyMonthly
    Short Term AFRs
    (Term 3 Years or Less)
    0.54% 0.54% 0.54% 0.54%
    Mid Term AFRs
    (Term More Than 3 Years
    and Less Than 9 Years)
    2.44% 2.43% 2.42% 2.42%
    Long Term AFRs
    (Term More Than 9 Years)
    4.30% 4.25% 4.23% 4.21%
    Section 7520 Rate 3.0%

    Quick Links...


    Giarmarco, Mullins & Horton, P.C. | 101 West Big Beaver Road | Tenth Floor | Troy | MI | 48084